On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 15:11, Sam Ruby wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > > I'm perfectly okay with "starting over" regarding rules, bylaws, project > > organisation, setup, etc etc. I don't think starting over completely > > from a code perspective is a good idea. Some parts of avalon are of > > solid enterprise quality and have been released as such and should be > > supported. But this is again an aside; it's the proposed PMCs job to > > decide all that, innit? ;) > > A very subtle point, and I don't expect it to completely make sense yet, > but I will put it out for you to consider it anyway: > > The PMC should try to limit itself to management decisions and actions. > All technical decisions should be made by the set of active > committers. What makes this particularly confusing is that the PMC > should be made up of the set of active committers. But all that means > is that many people will be fulfilling multiple roles.
that's what I ment :) something like: "it's the job of the avalon committers to decide whether starting over in the technical sense is a good idea; the PMC creation is to allow the avalon community to take the management actions that enable such a restructuring". cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
