Leo Simons wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 08:17, Peter Donald wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:02, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Also discussion about the way the "new" avalon will operate disturbs me.
It has been implied that the PMC will be making development decisions to
solve some of the problems.
where?
I have a lot to catch up on. What "new" avalon are we talking about?
Essentially if it is not the framework or a container it becomes out of scope.
So majority of exclibur/cornerstone/logkit/apps gets moved out. The remaining
containers (fortress/merlin) then go back into jakarta-avalon/scratchpad and
get rebuilt from scratch (perhaps along with framework via the avalon5
proposal). As Nicola put it "Phoenix community != Avalon community, it's
quite clear to all" so I assume his opinion was that phoenix also got
ejected.
I'm strongly -1 on such a move. Frankly, 'ejecting' phoenix seems quite
silly to even consider.
I would say that, if avalon were to merge CVSes, fortress and merlin
would go to avalon/scratchpad and that phoenix and ecm would go to
avalon/phoenix and avalon/ecm, respectively (or something similar). I
would guess that is also what Nicola meant, ie he assumed we all agree
that Phoenix would definitely get a place in a "new" avalon so he didn't
mention it.
Correct.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
