> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Stefano, > > > more than these statistical details, I would like to know > if somebody > > ever implemented something in Phoenix that Peter didn't > like or voted > > -1 on. > > There are numerous I'm sure. Servicable was a triumph of > group design, > with Peter (as well as a number of us) modifying proposals > multiple times. > > More recently Peter -1'd the split of avalon-framework.jar > into two > (three incl existing). Having said that he's not longer objecting.
But I am :P You can't expect everyone to follow suit with the implementation and API in separate JARs. Even Sun combines them. There are solutions that don't impose packaging requirements on others. I suggest we pursue those. > Out of Avalon-Framework, we proposed the same jar split to > cornerstone.jar and got it thru despite Peter's objection. Again, I believe that JAR multiplication isn't the solution. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
