+1 for plan 2.
Motivation: The important part about Avalon is framework, and it is also
there that my main interest lies. An �bercontainer would be nice, but I
honestly don't have any problem for it to solve, and thus my interest in
building one is minimal. On the other hand, I use the framework interfaces
all the time, and getting the contracts for them well defined is thus of
major importance for me.
Berin, you state that plan 2 may lead to a lot of "my way is better than
your way", and I have two comments to that:
1) Plan 1 does so, too. You only state it implicitely, and I'd like to
state that explicitely.
2) Those are issues we have to reach concensus on anyway. Charting a course
that will takes us head-on with the big problems we have might be a very
good thing.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Peter Royal
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Neeme Praks
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Stephen McConnell
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Stephen McConnell
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Stefano Mazzocchi
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Marcus Crafter
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Mircea Toma
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Leif Mortenson
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Paul Hammant
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Leo Simons
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Leo Sutic
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Carsten Ziegeler
- Re: [VOTE] Plans to move ahead Stefano Mazzocchi
