Peter Donald wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:11, Paul Hammant wrote:I'd prefer this to be done to HEAD entirely. Why? Well we have pre-alpha of 4.1 available for download and no promises have been made for alpha or beta of 4.1. If assembly.xml is present I'd imagine that there is no need for the experimental code to be executed. As such, and given all live usages of Phoenix will already have assembly.xml files in the sar file, I'd suspect that there is not problem for head development..
It is not so much because it is experimental but because I don't want to break anything I can't fix and sans CVS access thats could happen. The changes are wide-ranging and require massive updates to a whole sleugh of files - mainly as auto-assembly was written on top of an ContainerKit-enabled Phoenix. So while there is such large changes I would prefer it to happen in a branch. We can suck it back into head in a few weeks if all goes well.
We are discussing about a new single container with profiles, wouldn't be better to put all further development on hold, switch to maintainance mode and focus on that?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
