Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Avalon has still in minds of many a bad name about the heavy refactorings it did years ago. Avalon is stable, works well, but still developers remember what happened back then. I don't want this to repeat.
Avalon is stable? Things like the following indicate otherwise:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-12-02/jakarta-avalon-phoenix.html - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
