On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 21:43, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > Avalon has still in minds of many a bad name about the heavy
> > refactorings it did years ago. Avalon is stable, works well, but still
> > developers remember what happened back then. I don't want this to repeat.
>
> Avalon is stable? Things like the following indicate otherwise:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-12-02/jakarta-avalon-phoenix.html\
Nah - that indicates that people don't consider gump a high priority.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
----------------------------------------
Whatever you do will be insignificant,
but it is very important that you do it.
--Gandhi
----------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
