On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 09:58 AM, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > Is AltRMI fast enough for high performance requirements?
What are your performance requirements? See http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/excalibur/altrmi/transports.html for some number from altrmi. > Anyway, this problem has got me thinking. What is the benefit of > running Jo! under Phoenix as compared to a stand-alone solution? Good question :) The only one I can think of would be having a single JVM instance on the machine. > Ok, if there is a high-performance communication channel with AltRMI, > then that would be a good reason. But somehow this doesn't seem to me > to follow the Avalon philosophy of componentization and IoC. I can't > really explain it well at this moment, so just take it as some random > thoughts. no, I agree with you, it doesn't seem as ideal as it should. it would be very nice to have a componentized servlet container that integrated nicely with the rest of the avalon frameworks. > BTW, what route has been taken with Sevak in this regard? I believe Sevak runs as a block, so as long as you will only have a single webapp inside of it you can embed it within your SAR. -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
