Peter Royal wrote: > On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 09:58 AM, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > >> Is AltRMI fast enough for high performance requirements? > > > What are your performance requirements? See > http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/excalibur/altrmi/transports.html for > some number from altrmi.
Hmm... I want to use Jo! as a webserver for publishing dynamic content. The actual content generation is in a .sar-application. I want to take advantage of the fact that by using Jo! I don't need to invoke a plug-in on the webserver, possibly over a costly TCP connection and re-parse the request on the servlet engine side. I'm not sure what the numbers on the site mean, maybe there should be a number for "direct method call" for comparison. > no, I agree with you, it doesn't seem as ideal as it should. it would be > very nice to have a componentized servlet container that integrated > nicely with the rest of the avalon frameworks. Yep, that's what I meant. >> BTW, what route has been taken with Sevak in this regard? > > I believe Sevak runs as a block, so as long as you will only have a > single webapp inside of it you can embed it within your SAR. Hm, well, Tomcat is not exactly a speed-freak either :) Ulrich -- Ulrich Mayring DENIC eG, Systementwicklung -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
