On Friday 26 April 2002 02:51 am, Leo Simons wrote: > Peter, a massive +1 here. This is definately what we all want to see; it > is all a question of having time to code it.
kewl. since my employer needs it, that should take care of the time issue :) > As we all really would like to go beta with phoenix, if what you want to > do requires many changes in the phoenix interfaces (everything client > apps/blocks see), there is a time constraint (undetermined as of yet...I > think Paul's our Release Manager ;) in that corner to think about... What I'm envisioning should be transparent to apps/blocks. The only change for them would be that we could support the Reconfigurable interface and enable reconfiguration w/o a restart of the app. I just went and re-read over the TODO list, my ideas cover quite a few of the items on the list. Otherwise all the changes would be farther down in the app loading process. But I do agree about the moving towards beta. Perhaps we can start moving towards a 4.0 release and mark these changes for a 4.1? We've been using the current CVS build for 6 months with nary a problem. -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
