On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:28, Peter Royal wrote: > On Friday 26 April 2002 02:51 am, Leo Simons wrote: > > Peter, a massive +1 here. This is definately what we all want to see; it > > is all a question of having time to code it. > > kewl. since my employer needs it, that should take care of the time issue > :)
excellent! > > As we all really would like to go beta with phoenix, if what you want to > > do requires many changes in the phoenix interfaces (everything client > > apps/blocks see), there is a time constraint (undetermined as of yet...I > > think Paul's our Release Manager ;) in that corner to think about... > > What I'm envisioning should be transparent to apps/blocks. The only change > for them would be that we could support the Reconfigurable interface and > enable reconfiguration w/o a restart of the app. I just went and re-read > over the TODO list, my ideas cover quite a few of the items on the list. yep ;) > But I do agree about the moving towards beta. Perhaps we can start moving > towards a 4.0 release and mark these changes for a 4.1? We've been using > the current CVS build for 6 months with nary a problem. Basically the only thing holding back beta is the JMX interface. As soon as we have one of them (even if it is relatively raw) then we are good to go. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
