I will get newer version for avrdude and see if it works,
Thank you Suhas On 3/7/07, Joerg Wunsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As Suhas Pharkute wrote: > The AVR910 does not work for sure, ... What does it do? If it's only the wrong device code returned by the programmer (there's a strong disagreement about device codes for almost anything that hasn't been standardized in the original appnote 910), you might either hack your avrdude.conf file, or force it with -F. > and I could not find AVR109 entries in config file. ... It's avr109, not AVR109. You must have a *really* old avrdude if that's not there, as the names avr109 and avr911 have been added before release 5.0 already. You could also call it "butterfly" if you want, but if you've really got such an old avrdude, it probably won't work either. As I said, AVR910 is a poor protocol, for a number of reasons. The one-byte device codes belong to these. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
_______________________________________________ AVR-chat mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
