As Bernard Fouché wrote:
> My opinion is that if we could reach the
> final memory state that we want by using macros instead of compiled
> code, we may have something that is easy to configure and has no side
> effect with malloc/free and that will not use unneeded code bytes:
> __do_copy_data() will do the job for us.
>
> So if we can have something like (using the current l__file):
>
> ->in stdio.h:
> #define STDIO_SETUP(stream,buf,put,get,flags) FILE stream={buf,\
> 0,\
> flags,\
> sizeof(buf),\
> 0,\
> put,\
> get}
That might basically work, yes. Seems like a good idea to me. You
forgot the buffer for the FP stuff, but that's easy to add the same
way.
Other opinions?
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
