Joerg Wunsch wrote:
Errm, you'd still need to supply a dummy implementation for malloc() anyway when using the floating-point versions. vfprintf() or vfscanf() will cause reference to malloc() [and free()] as they do not know at link-time they won't really be needed.
Now why not have an alloca(3) in libc? Sure it is not the best way to manage dynamic memory but vfprintf/scanf are typicall applications where it is acceptable. And a functionning alloca() is always handy. Bernard _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
