"Graham Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Or, would the maintainers of the "golden" documentation abandon that
> in favor of the Wiki?

If you're talking about the avr-libc documentation: no, not really.
The existing doxygen documentation at least has the advantage that it
can be easily installed offline on the target system (in the version
matching the library).

I wouldn't mind a Wiki for something like "more general recipes"
(tutorials and such) that is out of scope of the avr-libc
documentation (which more focuses on being a reference manual, and
providing some minimal examples to get you started).

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list

Reply via email to