Hi there, I'm working on the duplicate thing and I'm facing a critical issue. It has been decided that we should not care mutch if pins where active low or active high(such as SS, RD, WR, etc).
http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc1477.pdf See page 2 PB0 and PB1 This seems to be as a legitimate duplicate. This will end up in the following as a duplicate entry in the pin define section: #define OC1A_DDR DDRB Any opinion for a work around, better idea? Thanks. Sorry M. Weddington for the PV. 2009/4/7 Weddington, Eric <[email protected]>: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: >> [email protected] >> [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu. >> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau >> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:22 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names >> >> Hi, >> >> So I'm back from travel, I'll be looking into those thing shortly. >> >> As for notifying Atmel of mistake/errors/inconsistencies in XML files >> I thing it will be harder than what you make it sound like. Using the >> librairy, we load the XML in ram as an object tree. When I walk the >> tree, I can find errors but I cannot relate back to the XML line. > > Hmm. For now, don't worry about trying to find errors. I'll see what I can do > with your (future) updated patch. > _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
