> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau > Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 9:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names > > > Would it be then a good idea to have let says: > #define OC1A_DDR .... > #define OC1AN_DDR ... > > "N" as in negative or "I" as in Inverted. I don't like "I" as it can > be mistaken for a lower case "L". > > Any though on that?
So far I like the "N" version. > As a side note, I had to modify some AVR Studio XML(Some had duplicate > entries or invalids one) to generate my patch(patch generation is > pending due to the current issue). Should I include a patch for the > Atmel XML also? No, don't bother. Unfortunately those files would not get patched. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
