As David Brown wrote: > Would it be possible to replace the typedef with a #define?
That's always problematic, given the vastly different way between the way a macro and a typedef are actually operating. > I haven't looked at it in detail, so that's just a stab in the dark > - but it might get the "delay until use" effect you want. Well, if someone can come up with a scheme that will really work that way, I agree we could do that (with the __PROG_TYPE_COMPAT__ option to fall back to the typedef-based deprecated implementation). -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
