>I am really not sure. There is no read use of such a type, it's just because >some guys are to lazy to type some letters. Moreover in the case of pointers, >you have the difference between pointers, const pointers, pointers to const and >const pointers to const etc. and all for arbitrary number of types and other >qualifiers like volatile, signed or unsigned. > >For the matter of clearness I'd discourage such code obfuscation, there is no >real benefit.
Couldn't the same be said of *any* typedef? Or macro? Or, for that matter, functions, which too serve to spare some typing and potentially obfuscate things? JW _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
