But given that you can make a projection of a 3D monitor on a 2D monitor, you could make a projection of a projection of a 4D image on a 2D monitor.
So from that point you could project any number of dimensions simply by wrapping projections within projections, no? On Apr 2, 2:40 pm, Sakri Rosenstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > you just need a 3d monitor to do 4d projections and a 4d monitor for > 5d projections etc, no big deal... > > On 4/2/11, wagster <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was assuming intersection, but only because that's how I envisage a > > 2D person seeing our 3D objects, so that's how I try to get my head > > around 4D objects. > > > To be honest though, I haven't really thought this through! > > > On Apr 2, 10:33 am, makc <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2 Кві, 12:12, wagster <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Mathematically you can have as many dimensions as you like. The > >> > problem is how to look at them. > > >> then why stop at 4D altogether? why not Away "XD" > > >> also, what would be your approach to this? you can do projection, but > >> then the image is going to be very messy. or you can do intersection, > >> but then you will have to do a lot of math.
