try avoid using mouseEvents if you can or at least try another way.
on my 2 1/2 yo mac 17'', it runs 60/60 if the mouse is not on the window, if
on, I get 30/60 in Safari.
Fabrice
On Jun 9, 2011, at 11:40 PM, wagster wrote:
> 60FPS? You must be using a non-crap machine!
>
> I have no idea why there's the amount of polys that there are - I'm
> just pulling vector data out of GraphicsPath commands, then extruding
> it, code below. If you can think of a cleaner approach then I'm all
> ears!
>
> package
> {
> import Singularity.Geom.Bezier2;
>
> import __AS3__.vec.Vector;
>
> import away3d.containers.ObjectContainer3D;
> import away3d.entities.Mesh;
> import away3d.extrusions.LinearExtrude;
> import away3d.tools.Merge;
>
> import com.codeazur.as3swf.exporters.AS3GraphicsDataShapeExporter;
> import com.codeazur.as3swf.tags.TagDefineShape;
> import com.codeazur.as3swf.tags.TagDefineSprite;
> import com.codeazur.as3swf.timeline.FrameObject;
>
> import flash.display.GraphicsPath;
> import flash.display.IGraphicsData;
> import flash.geom.Vector3D;
>
> public class Walls extends Mesh
> {
>
> private var _data:Vector.<IGraphicsData>;
> private var _bezier:Bezier2 = new Bezier2();
> private var _graphicsExporter:AS3GraphicsDataShapeExporter;
> private var _curveSegments:int = 4;
> private var _buildContainer:ObjectContainer3D;
>
> public function Walls(tag:TagDefineSprite)
> {
> super();
>
>
>
> _graphicsExporter = new
> AS3GraphicsDataShapeExporter(Main.structureSwf);
> // Initialise a Bezier2 class to calculate points on a
> curve
> _bezier = new Bezier2();
> _bezier.addControlPoint(0, 0);
> _bezier.addControlPoint(0, 0);
> _bezier.addControlPoint(0, 0);
> // Create a holder to add the walls to before merging
> _buildContainer = new ObjectContainer3D();
>
> // Grab the graphics data from the Sprite, extrude only
> the paths
> for each (var frameObject:FrameObject in
> tag.frames[0].objects)
> {
> var shape:TagDefineShape =
> (Main.structureSwf.getCharacter(frameObject.characterId) as
> TagDefineShape);
> shape.export(_graphicsExporter);
>
> Main.testOverlay.graphics.drawGraphicsData(_graphicsExporter.graphicsData);
> extrudePaths(_graphicsExporter.graphicsData);
> }
>
> var merge:Merge = new Merge(false, true, false);
> merge.apply(this,
> merge.applyToContainer(_buildContainer));
> _buildContainer = null;
> material = Main.wallsMaterial;
>
> }
>
> private function
> extrudePaths(graphicsData:Vector.<IGraphicsData>):void
> {
> for each (var graphicsCommand:IGraphicsData in
> graphicsData)
> {
> if (graphicsCommand is GraphicsPath)
> {
> extrudePath(graphicsCommand as
> GraphicsPath);
> }
> }
> }
>
> private function extrudePath(path:GraphicsPath):void
> {
> var profile:Vector.<Vector3D>;
> profile = new Vector.<Vector3D>;
>
> //loop through the remaining commands
>
> for (var i:int = 0; i < path.commands.length; i++)
> {
> // GraphicsPathCommands: 0 - NO_OP | 1 -
> MOVE_TO | 2 -
> LINE_TO | 3 - CURVE_TO
> switch (path.commands[i])
> {
>
> case 1: // MOVE_TO - extrude profile if
> exists, start new profile
> if (profile.length > 0)
> addExtrusion(profile);
> profile = new Vector.<Vector3D>;
> profile.push(new
> Vector3D(path.data.shift(), 0, -
> path.data.shift()));
> break;
> case 2: // LINE_TO - add a new profile
> point
> profile.push(new
> Vector3D(path.data.shift(), 0, -
> path.data.shift()));
> break;
> case 3: // CURVE_TO - add profile
> points along curve
> addCurve(profile, path);
> break;
> }
> }
> addExtrusion(profile);
> }
>
> private function addCurve(profile:Vector.<Vector3D>,
> path:GraphicsPath):void
> {
> _bezier.moveControlPoint(0, profile[profile.length -
> 1].x,
> profile[profile.length - 1].z);
> _bezier.moveControlPoint(1, path.data.shift(),
> -path.data.shift());
> _bezier.moveControlPoint(2, path.data.shift(),
> -path.data.shift());
>
> for (var i:Number = 1/_curveSegments; i < 1; i +=
> 1/_curveSegments)
> {
> profile.push(new Vector3D(_bezier.getX(i), 0,
> _bezier.getY(i)));;
> }
> profile.push(new Vector3D(_bezier.getControlPoint(2).X,
> 0,
> _bezier.getControlPoint(2).Y));
>
> }
>
> private function addExtrusion(profile:Vector.<Vector3D>):void
> {
> var linearExtrude:LinearExtrude = new
> LinearExtrude(null, profile,
> LinearExtrude.Y_AXIS, 20, 3, false, 2, 3, null, false, false, "",
> false);
> _buildContainer.addChild(linearExtrude);
> }
> }
> }
>
> On Jun 9, 9:50 pm, Michael Iv <explomas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I get 60/60 FPS. But can you tell me why you have almost 100000 polys? I
>> think with such a model you can reduce the poly count at least to 20-30%
>> less.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM, wagster <ja...@pictureandword.com> wrote:
>>> Sure - here's a 3 storey hotel built programmatically:
>>
>>> http://www.pictureandword.com/test_platforms/floorplan_viewer/v2/inde...
>>
>>> That's pretty much worst case scenario - I don't actually need the
>>> third storey, I just added it to see at what point the frame rate will
>>> start dropping. It's just on the edge now with 100k polys. Any tips
>>> on squeezing a bit more performance from it? I can't imagine I'll get
>>> much more than that.
>>
>>> The absence of floors will tell you why I'm waiting for a concave
>>> DelaunayMesh or preferably a Swf class. Guests will immediately fall
>>> into infinity with this kind of setup.
>>
>>> Wag
>>
>>> On Jun 9, 4:16 pm, Fabrice3D <fabric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> screendump or url of these "seriously complex building layouts" we could
>>> see???
>>
>>>> Fabrice
>>
>>>> On Jun 9, 2011, at 4:46 PM, wagster wrote:
>>
>>>>> I know - patience is a virtue and all that :)
>>
>>>>> I ended up using Wumedia Swf class for the floor and LinearExtrusion
>>>>> for the walls in 3.6 (everything is drawn in Flash IDE as we need to
>>>>> production-line our building layouts). This has the advantage that
>>>>> you can draw labels and all sorts of things on the floor - perfect for
>>>>> me. Think I'll probably do the same when Swf resurfaces.
>>
>>>>> BTW - LinearExtrude + Merge allows for some seriously complex building
>>>>> layouts at high framerates!
>>
>>>>> On Jun 9, 3:14 pm, Fabrice3D <fabric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> no, that would be one of next classes coming.
>>>>>> this one simply "connects" vectors as Mesh. It doesn't have any
>>> awareness of a "path" or defined contours/constrains.
>>
>>>>>> Regarding architectural applications, one that I've started a while
>>> ago and hope to finish one of these days, will allow you to define one or
>>> more "holes", basically closed shapes, rects, circles etc
>>>>>> and eventually another class would use that result to extrude. think
>>> here the wall with door and window, extruded at wall thickness. But as some
>>> features required are very near of booleans operations,
>>>>>> so I started do more research in that field first, to see if I could
>>> do this via a smarter way...
>>
>>>>>> I will gradually add these (hopefuly) usefull classes as I go. But I
>>> can't garanty they will be released in a logical order. By that I mean that
>>> like in case above of the wall being extruded
>>>>>> the class doing this might be released before the one actually
>>> generating the base mesh with "holes".
>>
>>>>>> There are still many 3.6 classes that need to join the 4.0 packages
>>> and get enhanced in the process.
>>>>>> As said before, all happends 1 by 1 :))
>>
>>>>>> Fabrice
>>
>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2011, at 3:48 PM, wagster wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Oh cool - another prezzie from the Fabrice factory!
>>
>>>>>>> I put together a Delaunay class myself (for architectural generation)
>>>>>>> a couple of months ago but gave up because I couldn't make it handle
>>>>>>> concave shapes. Did you get that figured out? (I know, I know, I
>>>>>>> could just try it out, but I'm at work and I can't wait until I get
>>>>>>> home!)
>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 11:40 am, Fabrice3D <fabric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>
>>>>>>>> I've just added 2 new classes to Broomstick
>>>>>>>> and 1 example class.
>>
>>>>>>>> - DelaunayMesh:
>>>>>>>> Located in "extrusions" package this class allows you to generate
>>> meshes from (random) vectors. At least 3 are required.
>>>>>>>> This is very usefull in many cases, such as terrain building from
>>> pointclouds data, closing shapes, architectural generation, editing tools
>>> (such as Prefab ;) ) etc etc
>>
>>>>>>>> - Trident
>>>>>>>> Our good old dev friend is back, but this time, located into "debug"
>>> package instead of primitives
>>>>>>>> It works exactly as the previous versions, except you are now also
>>> able to change it's position and it looks a bit more sexy :)
>>
>>>>>>>> - Demo class
>>>>>>>> I've added a simple example of a random cloud of vector3d's to mesh
>>> using the Delaunay class, in the code
>>>>>>>> you'll find as well the Trident in action for those new to Away and
>>> even added a small snippet for the new MeshDebugger in case you've missed my
>>> post on this one.
>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Fabrice
>>
>> --
>> Michael Ivanov ,Programmer
>> Neurotech Solutions Ltd.
>> Flex|Air |3D|Unity|www.neurotechresearch.comhttp://blog.alladvanced.net
>> Tel:054-4962254
>> mich...@neurotech.co.il
>> t...@neurotech.co.il
>
> On Jun 9, 9:50 pm, Michael Iv <explomas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I get 60/60 FPS. But can you tell me why you have almost 100000 polys? I
>> think with such a model you can reduce the poly count at least to 20-30%
>> less.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM, wagster <ja...@pictureandword.com> wrote:
>>> Sure - here's a 3 storey hotel built programmatically:
>>
>>> http://www.pictureandword.com/test_platforms/floorplan_viewer/v2/inde...
>>
>>> That's pretty much worst case scenario - I don't actually need the
>>> third storey, I just added it to see at what point the frame rate will
>>> start dropping. It's just on the edge now with 100k polys. Any tips
>>> on squeezing a bit more performance from it? I can't imagine I'll get
>>> much more than that.
>>
>>> The absence of floors will tell you why I'm waiting for a concave
>>> DelaunayMesh or preferably a Swf class. Guests will immediately fall
>>> into infinity with this kind of setup.
>>
>>> Wag
>>
>>> On Jun 9, 4:16 pm, Fabrice3D <fabric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> screendump or url of these "seriously complex building layouts" we could
>>> see???
>>
>>>> Fabrice
>>
>>>> On Jun 9, 2011, at 4:46 PM, wagster wrote:
>>
>>>>> I know - patience is a virtue and all that :)
>>
>>>>> I ended up using Wumedia Swf class for the floor and LinearExtrusion
>>>>> for the walls in 3.6 (everything is drawn in Flash IDE as we need to
>>>>> production-line our building layouts). This has the advantage that
>>>>> you can draw labels and all sorts of things on the floor - perfect for
>>>>> me. Think I'll probably do the same when Swf resurfaces.
>>
>>>>> BTW - LinearExtrude + Merge allows for some seriously complex building
>>>>> layouts at high framerates!
>>
>>>>> On Jun 9, 3:14 pm, Fabrice3D <fabric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> no, that would be one of next classes coming.
>>>>>> this one simply "connects" vectors as Mesh. It doesn't have any
>>> awareness of a "path" or defined contours/constrains.
>>
>>>>>> Regarding architectural applications, one that I've started a while
>>> ago and hope to finish one of these days, will allow you to define one or
>>> more "holes", basically closed shapes, rects, circles etc
>>>>>> and eventually another class would use that result to extrude. think
>>> here the wall with door and window, extruded at wall thickness. But as some
>>> features required are very near of booleans operations,
>>>>>> so I started do more research in that field first, to see if I could
>>> do this via a smarter way...
>>
>>>>>> I will gradually add these (hopefuly) usefull classes as I go. But I
>>> can't garanty they will be released in a logical order. By that I mean that
>>> like in case above of the wall being extruded
>>>>>> the class doing this might be released before the one actually
>>> generating the base mesh with "holes".
>>
>>>>>> There are still many 3.6 classes that need to join the 4.0 packages
>>> and get enhanced in the process.
>>>>>> As said before, all happends 1 by 1 :))
>>
>>>>>> Fabrice
>>
>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2011, at 3:48 PM, wagster wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Oh cool - another prezzie from the Fabrice factory!
>>
>>>>>>> I put together a Delaunay class myself (for architectural generation)
>>>>>>> a couple of months ago but gave up because I couldn't make it handle
>>>>>>> concave shapes. Did you get that figured out? (I know, I know, I
>>>>>>> could just try it out, but I'm at work and I can't wait until I get
>>>>>>> home!)
>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 11:40 am, Fabrice3D <fabric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>
>>>>>>>> I've just added 2 new classes to Broomstick
>>>>>>>> and 1 example class.
>>
>>>>>>>> - DelaunayMesh:
>>>>>>>> Located in "extrusions" package this class allows you to generate
>>> meshes from (random) vectors. At least 3 are required.
>>>>>>>> This is very usefull in many cases, such as terrain building from
>>> pointclouds data, closing shapes, architectural generation, editing tools
>>> (such as Prefab ;) ) etc etc
>>
>>>>>>>> - Trident
>>>>>>>> Our good old dev friend is back, but this time, located into "debug"
>>> package instead of primitives
>>>>>>>> It works exactly as the previous versions, except you are now also
>>> able to change it's position and it looks a bit more sexy :)
>>
>>>>>>>> - Demo class
>>>>>>>> I've added a simple example of a random cloud of vector3d's to mesh
>>> using the Delaunay class, in the code
>>>>>>>> you'll find as well the Trident in action for those new to Away and
>>> even added a small snippet for the new MeshDebugger in case you've missed my
>>> post on this one.
>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Fabrice
>>
>> --
>> Michael Ivanov ,Programmer
>> Neurotech Solutions Ltd.
>> Flex|Air |3D|Unity|www.neurotechresearch.comhttp://blog.alladvanced.net
>> Tel:054-4962254
>> mich...@neurotech.co.il
>> t...@neurotech.co.il
