Pierre Maziere <pierre.mazi...@gmail.com> writes: > The first patch fixes the x,y position of wiboxes when stretched, > which is the default for awful.wibox: I had gaps between vertical and > horizontal stretched wiboxes with borders (borders were the issue > because of the way wibox x and y are calculated)
Pushed into master and 3.4. > The second one fixes what I think is an error (but I may be wrong, it > depends on the intention of the original coder): clients should take > into account wibox borders and not recover them. Thus, struts had to > be corrected: again I may have missed something here, but it felt > wrong No, you're right. Pushed also. > The third is the new feature: stackable wiboxes. When you add a wibox > using awful.wibox, it will be stacked after the last one at the same > position (top, bottom, left or right). I guess we should have a way to > easily move wiboxes order, but I wanted to have a feedback first. > Why stackable wiboxes ? because: > 1/ it's easier than dealing with widget layouts > 2/ calling several times awful.wibox for the same position recovers > the previous wibox > > but with the re-parenting stuff currently developed, I don't know if > it is still relevant. Well, actually you're right that it does not make that so much sense with the stacking stuff. And it's a ugly hack, so I won't merge I guess. -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <jul...@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-devel-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
