2009/6/7 Nikos Ntarmos <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 02:38:24AM +0400, Сергей Миронов wrote: >> 2009/4/12 koniu <[email protected]>: >> > 2009/4/12 Сергей Миронов <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi, i`m writing config to implement some of shifty's functionality (by >> >> the way, Is shifty dead or alive nowdays?) >> > >> > It's more and more alive again, I've updated the wiki today, see that >> > for details. Testing much appreciated ;] >> > >> >> every tag's layout resets to 'floating'. Is it a bug? >> > >> > screen:tags(arg) does wipe all tag properties: >> > http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=493 >> > >> > jd has a branch (new-object) which removes use of otable and is >> > supposed to alleviate this issue. It should soon find its way to >> > master branch. >> > >> > hope this helps, >> > koniu >> > >> >> Hi! i tried to check the case again. Now i use awesome 3.2.1-r3 and >> following wmii wiki guide >> http://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/WMII-like_tag_management >> >> In function >> >> function sort_tags(screen_no) >> local all_tags = screen[screen_no]:tags() >> table.sort(all_tags, function (a, b) return a.name < b.name end) >> screen[screen_no]:tags(all_tags) >> end >> >> i see same behavior as earlier - screen:tags() resets all tag's properties. >> It is strange for me, because i know, that bug #493 was closed at 12 april. >> How can it be, am i missing something? > > Hi there buddy. > > The new object system went in the tree post 3.2.1. Could you please try > with one of the 3.3.x tags? > > Cheers. > > \n\n > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected]. >
Haha, 3.3 works fine! Manythanks :) -- С Уважением, Сергей. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
