On 04/11/2012 06:43 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote: > Hi Omair, > > The analysis below sounds reasonable to me, and as I've already > mentioned I'm OK with your fix. > > Let's hear what Artem says though.
Yes, I was trying to convince Artem all this time ;) > PS. Perhaps it also makes sense to rewrite that comment in the > XDecoratedPeer to replace the word "bug" with something saying that this > is implemented according to the ICCCM specification with a reference to > the paragraph 4.1.5 of it? Agreed. I would like to go so far as to make this the default, and add other window managers (which are deviating from ICCCM) as exceptions. I am afraid of introducing regressions, though. Thanks, Omair
