Hi Alan,

The spec changes that you propose look reasonable to me.

--
best regards,
Anthony

On 06/18/2013 05:45 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:

I didn't see replies on this thread although I did chat with Artem
briefly about the proposal.

To re-cap, the proposal is:

For jdk8:

1. Deprecate the 3 methods defined by SecurityManager with a warning
that they will change in a future release to check AllPermission.
2. Change java.awt.Toolkit and java.awt.Window (spec + implementation)
so that they check AWTPermission directly.

Future (maybe jdk9 project once that is open):

1. Change (spec+implementation) the 3 SecurityManager methods to check
AllPermission.

The rational for doing this in two steps is allow for migration. These
are JDK 1.0/1.1 era methods so we have to be careful. The change to
Toolkit and Window is not strictly required to be done in 8 so I would
be open to pushing these out to (to 9) if there is good reason.

I've put a webrev with the javadoc changes here (ignore the
implementation for now):

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8008981/webrev/

At this point I want to get agreement on the API/spec changes. I also
want to understand if there are any potential compatibility issues. As I
mentioned in the first mail, then custom security managers that override
checkTopLevelWindow, checkSystemClipboardAccess and checkTopLevelWindow
will see a difference in that checkPermission will be called directly.
Beyond that then I don't see an issues.

Thanks,

-Alan.

Reply via email to