Hello, Alexander. We should either combine these 2 fixes together or back port them separately. I don’t think it’s a good idea to mix different fixes in a single back port. It could be a good to also back port 8012026, but as a separate fix.
>> The back-port and the main fix integrated into JDK 8 are slightly different. Dmitry, could you pleas tell what’s the difference? Thank you. With best regards. Petr. 20 февр. 2014 г., в 1:51 после полудня, Alexander Scherbatiy <alexandr.scherba...@oracle.com> написал(а): > > Could you look at the JDK-8012026 fix to investigate, should the > NSTrackingActiveInActiveApp option be changed to NSTrackingActiveAlways > for the resetTrackingRect method in the AWTView.m file for the backport? > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-August/005347.html > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/8012026/webrev.00/ > > Thanks, > Alexandr. > > On 2/11/2014 1:46 PM, dmitry markov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Could you review a back-port of 7171045 to JDK 7u, please? The back-port and >> the main fix integrated into JDK 8 are slightly different. >> >> bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7171045 >> webrev for jdk7u: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/7171045/jdk7u/webrev.00/ >> jdk8 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/e23311e924b1 >> technical review for jdk8: >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-August/003238.html >> >> Please note: the fix for 7171045 was partly backported to JDK 7u (see >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-August/003376.html for >> details). However, some problems related to this case still take place on >> JDK 7u. So it is necessary to backport full changeset integrated into JDK 8. >> >> Thanks, >> Dmitry >