The fix looks good for me.

  Thanks,
  Alexandr.

On 2/20/2014 3:40 PM, dmitry markov wrote:
Hello Alexander, Petr,

Thank you for review.
I agree, the option NSTrackingActiveInActiveApp should be changed to NSTrackingActiveAlways. If it is better to back port the changes for JDK-8012026 under separate fix, I can do it.

The difference between this backport and main fix is the changes in CViewPlatformEmbeddedFrame.java. The original changeset integrated into JDK 8 (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/e23311e924b1) does not have them, since this file was added later.

Thanks,
Dmitry

On 20/02/2014 14:09, Petr Pchelko wrote:
Hello, Alexander.

We should either combine these 2 fixes together or back port them separately. I 
don’t think it’s a good idea to mix different fixes in a single back port.
It could be a good to also back port 8012026, but as a separate fix.

The back-port and the main fix integrated into JDK 8 are slightly different.
Dmitry, could you pleas tell what’s the difference?

Thank you.
With best regards. Petr.


20 февр. 2014 г., в 1:51 после полудня, Alexander 
Scherbatiy<alexandr.scherba...@oracle.com>  написал(а):

  Could you look at the JDK-8012026 fix to investigate, should the 
NSTrackingActiveInActiveApp option be changed to NSTrackingActiveAlways
  for the resetTrackingRect method in the AWTView.m file for the backport?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2013-August/005347.html
    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/8012026/webrev.00/

  Thanks,
  Alexandr.

On 2/11/2014 1:46 PM, dmitry markov wrote:
Hello,

Could you review a back-port of 7171045 to JDK 7u, please? The back-port and 
the main fix integrated into JDK 8 are slightly different.

bug:http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7171045
webrev for jdk7u:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/7171045/jdk7u/webrev.00/
jdk8 changeset:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/e23311e924b1
technical review for 
jdk8:http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-August/003238.html

Please note: the fix for 7171045 was partly backported to JDK 7u 
(seehttp://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-August/003376.html  for 
details). However, some problems related to this case still take place on JDK 
7u. So it is necessary to backport full changeset integrated into JDK 8.

Thanks,
Dmitry


Reply via email to