It looks fine, I have run internal tests jck/regression
and no new issues were found.

Thank you for contribution.

On 13/11/2018 10:24, Martin Balao wrote:
Sergey,

Are we okay to go with Webrev.04?

Thanks,
Martin.-

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Laurent Bourgès
<bourges.laur...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Sergey approved the webrev.4, anyone else?

I would like this bug fix to be pushed soon, then this RFR.

Regards,
Laurent

Le ven. 9 nov. 2018 à 14:50, Laurent Bourgès <bourges.laur...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

Dear Martin & Sergey,

I just tested webrev.03 on latest openjdk12 and it passed my tests: good
job !
(I am not an official openjdk reviewer)

Le ven. 9 nov. 2018 à 14:43, Martin Balao <mba...@redhat.com> a écrit :

Hi,

Here we have Webrev.04:

  * http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8204142/8204142.webrev.04/
  *
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8204142/8204142.webrev.04.zip


I suppose the Webrev.04 only removed the SequencedEventTest class ?


@Sergey: are you okay to go?


I hope too.

Sergey, could you handle the backport process to JDK11u, please ?

Cheers,
Laurent


--
Best regards, Sergey.

Reply via email to