On 30.08.2020 11:49, Alexander Zuev wrote:
I did tried that approach and haven't found any benefits over the one i used in the fix - it is neither faster nor more accurate.
How it could be less accurate if it allows us to read the icon of the exact size, instead of some predefined size in our code (16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 72, 96, 128, 256)? As far as I understand If the file has only an icon of size 100,100 we will never return this one icon, but instead will build the list of icons. -- Best regards, Sergey.
