On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:15:25 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziem...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> General comment - I am not sure I like the `MTL` prefix acronym in names (ex. > `sun.java2d.metal.MTLVolatileSurfaceManager`). > > I think you tried to match the `CGL`, but that is a real acronym that stands > for "Core Graphics Layer" (I think). > > `MTL` on the other hand is no acronym. I can see `ML` for "Metal Layer" I > suppose, but also just `Metal` would work just fine. `MTL` is the abbreviation that Apple uses for Metal in all of their APIs. The only potential issue I might see with this prefix is in the native code where there could be name collisions between Java2D's names and Apple's names. Since we haven't run into such a collision, I don't think this needs to change, and wouldn't necessarily affect the Java class names anyway. If we were to consider it, `METAL` seems better than `ML` (which is too short to be descriptive and might suggest machine learning). ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2403
