On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:27:37 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255800 could have been a one line 
>> spec clean up but
>> it didn't take a lot of looking to realize there were many more 
>> inconsistencies between spec and implementation.
>> I've spent a lot of time on what is just small number of factory methods in 
>> Raster because there are so
>> many possible exceptions and in some cases they rely on other API they call 
>> to generate exceptions and
>> these may have not been documented or documented acc. to some long lost 
>> behavior.
>> I've mostly tried to ONLY change spec. But I couldn't help myself when some 
>> checks were missed that
>> ended up with bizarre and dubious behavior - throwing 
>> NegativeArrayIndexException which just about
>> always has to be an internal bug !
>> 
>> The supplied test passes on JDK 16 as well as this code, because the 
>> (relatively) small number of
>> cases where JDK 16 threw NegativeArrayIndexException are caught and allowed 
>> only for releases < 17
>> So where you see those in the test it corresponds to the behavioral changes 
>> from NegativeArrayIndexException
>> to IllegalArgumentException.
>> JCK conformance tests still pass so they must not test those conditions.
>
> Phil Race has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8255800: Raster creation methods need some specification clean up

Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3223

Reply via email to