Yeah. I understand what you are saying. But, do you think its a good practice to setup other european companies in the US environment due to differeces in the Tables FIelds of the same table in both environments?. Honestly, we have 24 companies in all the environments. Just imagine, it will be 72 companies all together if I want to setup in each environment?. We have Fianance up and running for the last 3 months. We have various cost center reports and balance sheet reports taken out of Axapta. For the P&L reports and consolidation, we are using TARGIT as the reporting tool. Thats a big mess as I am doing consolidation in the ATRGIT database. But it works perfectly fine as of now as we can produce the reports in all the global 5 currencies and vice versa. Last month , we got our Phase-II kicked off and have a lot of challenges in the road map like Project Contracts etc and we have many supply chains within a supply chain?. Just going ahead.....
Let us see and hope for the best.......
Many thanks ,
Subbu
vaibhav pednekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Subbu,
This is the most challenging part of all, intercompany
solutions across multiple database. i.e. across the
Globe.
Which at this stage is not possible, it becomes very
complex.
For this, in the Last meeting with Microsoft for
Global development, they have plans for including all
the localization in one package and then you can
activate them for the respective companies. But it
still in progress i think and wish so.
Currently working for a big MNC which has multiple
locations in Mulitple countries, here we have the same
challenge, but we have divided in phases.
First we will do only the Financial Consolidation,
here we have once database consists of all
Consolidated companies from each country. I.e. one
country has one consolidated company in same database.
and then we have the Group Consolidation company in it
where we use the Axapta online consolidation after
importing the trail balances in it.
But as per as Supply chain is concerned, still not
finalized the approach, as we will deal with it in 2nd
phase.
But u can setup different companies in your every
database, example in US - setup the US company, the
Europe company and the Spain company.
Please dont get pissed off me with, as just trying to
provide some base so that the logical thinking
processes is started and we can get to solution for
this.
I think for supply chain means, need to know the
stock, requirements, may be even the purchases and
sales. i limit to this only
So after setting up the companies in each database you
can import the records of the stocks, requirements,
i.e. planned orders or may be confirmed purchase
orders and sales orders.
You will be the best person to judge this, and then
you can have some reports or may be the approval
process at US company done and againg export the
relevant data to the respective compaines.
The localization will be only for the statutory and
legal things, which u can handle in the respective
database's after importing the transactions from other
databases.
In this way you can also manage to handle intercompany
transactions at some level.
I may be totally wrong at this point of time, but this
is it, how look at it. I still need to fully devote
time on this, as your are working on this situation
now, hope this can be of some help to you.
regards
Vaibhav Pednekar
--- Subbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When we contacted Microsoft for the Localisation
> rememdations for
> our business profile, they suggested 3
> localisations. In other
> words, the companies attached to these localisations
> will be setup
> in different databases.
>
> Likewise, we have USA, EUROPE and SPAIN companies
> setup under the
> respective environments. We had problems in many
> ways due to the
> localisations in finance module like consolidation
> and multi
> currency , global reporting etc etc etc across these
> 3 databases.
>
> We are implementing Supply chain for our business.
> We could n't do
> intercompany transactions ( SO/PO ) between EUROPE
> and SPAIN as they
> are not in the same database. Microsoft answers are
> very vague and
> doesn't help me.
>
> Does any one have any idea in dealing with
> intercompany transactions
> in different localisations????.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Subbu
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
| Get unlimited calls to U.S./Canada |
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
