[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Production Order vs. BOM

[Hans-Walter Bous]

Hi Yifat,
on the item (TAB PAGE References) you can set item coverage "Stop Explosion" to YES.
As long as this is set you'll get a planned purchase order.
JohnAxapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com wrote:
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!http://us.click.yahoo.com/Rcy2bD/UOnJAA/cosFAA/kGEolB/TM--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> There are 3 messages in this issue.Topics in this digest:1. I_1626ITEMIDXFrom: "Stefan Heidkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>2. RE : French Check Amount NamingFrom: "Steeve Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>3. Re: Production - Items vs BOMFrom: "rickhardy22" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 1 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005
 12:22:35 -0000From: "Stefan Heidkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: I_1626ITEMIDXHi allwe want to test with the standard database in 3.0 SP3. With the table InventDimCombination we have a index-problem as stated below:*Ja INVENTDIMCOMBINATION *ItemIdx (I_1626ITEMIDX) ist nicht vorhandenNein -"- *ItemIdx Enthält Duplikatdatensätze (nicht zulässig gemäß Index).How can we solve this problem?Many thanks in advance.Stefan Heidkamp ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 2 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:31:30 -0400From: "Steeve Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: RE : French Check Amount NamingYes, I'm in Quebec. That is a really detailed reply that explained a lot of things. Thanks a lot
 Jesper!Regards,Steeve... -----Message d'origine-----De : Jesper Kehlet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jesper KehletEnvoyé : 27 avril 2005 18:40À : Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.comObjet : RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] French Check Amount NamingSteeve, you are right that there is no fix for this because it is not supported functionality in Axapta in the first place! You are not in France, but in Quebec, right?The reason being that in France (Europe in general) most almost everybody is paying by direct, electronic bank transfers or giros, and not by check, so there was no need to develop this. Also, the french/Canada (fr-ca) language tribe is not supported by Microsoft in the first place. Support for french in Canada is actually the (different, slightly different, but still different) real french (fr), french/Belgium (fr-be) or french/Switzerland (fr-ch),
 which again are all european, and neither of them print checks. Actually check printing is only supported for USA, Denmark, Germany, UK, Spain and Mexico -- the US layout just happens to work for Canada, which is why it was release for Canada! 8-|So what you are asking for is not supported by Microsoft. Axapta is not officially approved/released for the french speaking part of Canada, but since it is the VAR that determines if a customer is french or not, well...So your deception should really only go towards your VAR, who "forgot" to tell you that Axapta hasn't been fully tested for french in Canada, only for english.Je regrette d'être le porteur de mauvaises nouvelles._____ From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Steeve GilbertSent: Wed 4/27/2005 4:18 PMTo: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.comSubject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] French Check Amount NamingHi
 everyone!We just found out that the amount in letter is not correct when printing check in french. Here's some exemple :4375,20 = Quatre Mille Trois Cent Soixante-dix Cinq et 20/100Soixante-dix Cinq?992,74 = Neuf Cent Quatre-vingt-dix Deux et 74/100Quatre-vingt-dix Deux?179,20 = Un Cent Soixante-dix Neuf et 20/100Un Cent?I've been told that there's no fix from Microsoft for this, is that true? Our VAR will install their fix (the fix they developed and had for a while. they knew about the problem but never told us until we found out... sorry... little rants here.) I just want to show my surprise and deception that there's no "official" fix and let other French language user know about the problem.Bye!Steeve... Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. _____ Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go
 to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . [This message contained attachments]________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Message: 3 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:05:37 -0000From: "rickhardy22" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: Production - Items vs BOMYifat,Thanks for your response. Yes, we want to be able to purchase and produce an item. Right now we use master planning to determine what to build and what to order. Our purchasing department goes to the planned purchase
 orders in the AP section and manufacuring goes to the Planned Production Orders in production. So since the item we are talking about is a purchased item we want the demand to show up in the planned purchase order section under purchasing - but if we do that that then the item has to be a part and manufacturing can not do a production order on it.Your suggestion below sounds like what we want to do. How do you tell an item that it should show up as a planned purchase order rather than a planned production order? I think that would solve our problem.Rick--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, "yifath1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> > hi there,> > Just an idea, why don't you set it up as a BOM, and in the planned > orders you can change a planned production order to a planned > purchase order. (you also have the ability to split the order > quantity)> >
 I don't know if I understand your concept completely, you want to be > able to purchase and produce an item. What is that about purchases > department and manufacturing department, how do they currently > decide what to purchase and what to manufacture?> > Yifat> > > > --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, "rickhardy22" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> > > > We have cases where we purcahse an item from a vendor and in the > rare > > case we may need to do some quality testing on it or do some minor > > modifications to it. We set the item up as an "item" in Axapta > beaces > > as demand shows up for the product our purchasing department knows > to > > order more. > > > > The problem we are having is how can our manufacturing department > > schedle a production order on it if its an item?
 We could switch > it > > to a BOM but then manufacuring would have to produce them rather > than > > them going directly to finished goods -and- how would purchasing > know > > to order more when needed.> > > > Has anybody run into this before, and if so how did you solve it? > Any > > help would be greatly appreciated.> > > > Rick________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.------------------------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
 to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/------------------------------------------------------------------------
		Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB kostenlosem Speicher


Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.








Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.