Dear Phil, Let me try to answer your question as below 1)The planned order (PO) always changes when we running master Scheduling (MS), but I don't understand that your Work order (WO) also changes. If I assume that WO is PO firmed/ at Production Module (Production Order) and qty PO firmed fulfills a Sales Order (SO), you can find out in WO at tab `reference' all information the last of PO number, SO Number, WO Number. If my assume is wrong would you like to tell me at what module WO your mean ?. On my demo PO number always changes, when I firmed PO should be move to WO. May be you need to recheck again your parameter at Master Plan (MP),Item coverage, MP setup, item setup or I guess your PO Spitted Qty not fulfills SO qty.
2) If you mean as figure below Item: FG-A (type Bom), WIP1 (type BOM), WIP2 (type BOM),ItemZ (type item), ItemW (type Item), FG-A has 3 BOM Bom Designer: BOM I * Bom1 For FG-A Consist of WIP1 (Bom2) & ItemZ * Bom2 for WIP1 Consist of WIP2 (Bom3) * Bom3 for WIP2 Consist of ItemW BOM II * Bom4 For FG-A Consist of WIP2 (Bom3) & ItemZ * Bom3 for WIP2 Consist of ItemW BOM III * Bom5 For FG-A Consist of WIP1 (Bom6) * Bom6 for WIP1 Consist of WIP2 (Bom7) * Bom7 for WIP2 Consist of ItemW & ItemZ you can use sub-bom setup at bom line (tab General) to setup your Bom as like 3 BOMs above. 3) is there any error or message appear ? I so Pls let me know . Hope this can help you, Pls let me know if I understand your problem. Regards, Tomi --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, "phil_walker1978" <phil_walker1...@...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > We have started to sell new items which are made-to-order. These > particular items are setup as BOM items, and a unique BOM is attached > to the sales line. Every BOM attached to the sales line consists of > about 6 items, one of which is another BOM. The MRP plan is > run, and viewing the net requirements shows the demand (from the > SalesLine), and a planned order (Ms_Po06000001) to satisfy the > SalesLine. The planned order is sebsequently firmed to create a works > order (W11111). > > However, a problem occurs when the MRP plan is re-generated again. > The net requirements suggests the original Works Order (W11111) is > deleted, and that a second planned order (Ms_Po06000002) is created. > > After some investigation I considered it odd that the Item Reference > on the References tab was missing - providing the link to the > original sales order. The original Works Order was posted with Update > Marking = No. > > Having deleted the original Works Order (W11111), the new planned > order (Ms_Po06000002) was posted with Update Marking = Standard, to > create a new Works Order (W11112). This completed the Item Reference > on the Works Order and Sales Order respectively. BUT when the MRP > plan was re-generated again it still suggested deletion of the Works > Order order (W11112) and proposed another new planned order > instead! :o( > > Therefore, Update Marking = Extended, was used which completed the > references, and also resolved the problem of suggesting deletions and > re-proposing a planned order. So far so good... However, a number > orders/items will not firm due to the following error : "No > estimation has been made for sub-production". > > So... > 1) Why does firming with "Standard" still not consider the relation > between the Sales Order and existing Works Order (and therefore keep > proposing works order deletions and new planned order) when the item > references clearly exist? > > 2) Does sub-production refer to BOM-Items which are included in the > BOM of the item for which I am creating production for? > > 3) We estimated all open production orders for any items within the > parent bom - but to no success! Any ideas on how to resolve this > error? > > It looks like there is more difference between "Standard" > and "Extended" update marking than the Axapta documentation suggests. > Ie. surely the estimation of sub-production bears no relation to the > link between an existing works order and the sales line. > > System: Axapta v3 sp2 (upgrading soon... hopefully) > > I look forward to any help or suggestions! :o) > > Many Thanks, > > Phil. >
