Exactly. But, even if the field attached with some enum type and after removed
from AOT (i.e., field is empty but, property is in Bold), it's printing the id
value of removed/un-available enum in AOT.
Please check.
Regards,
KBS
--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Sumit Loya <loya.su...@...>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What has happened is that the name of the Enum was changed so the EnumType
> field is empty (But the property is in Bold) which means there is an enum
> attached to the field but it is not found in the AOT. So the Enum Id is not
> empty but there is no name in the EnumType field.
>
> For your second query, when you create a new field of Enum type and do not
> assign anything, system by default assigns ABC type enum, this is what i
> have noticed and that is why it is displaying an Enum name
>
> Regards,
> Sumit
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:09 PM, tkbsmanian <tkbsman...@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Sumit,
> >
> > Thanks for your screenshots.
> >
> > But, my question is simple and straight forward (applicable for both AX40 &
> > AX5.0; but not to AX3.0).
> >
> > 1. How can it indicates that there is some enum attached even if
> > EnumType field is empty (as you replied)? If it indicates so, why
> > it is not printing the EnumName for DEL_BMBuildTable in AX4.0?
> >
> > 2. Why it is printing the EnumName for the user created field which
> > doesn't have EnumType/not attached against EnumType property?
> > (Having same field and table properties of DEL_BMBuildTable)
> >
> > Note : There is not only 'DEL_BMBuildTable'. There are 17 in AX4.0 and 13
> > in AX5.0 such as DEL_BMModuleParm, DEL_BMModuleTable, DEL_BMParm,
> > DEL_BMTableSetup etc.
> >
> > Please clarify.
> >
> > Thanks && Regards,
> > Balasubramanian Kuamaran.
> >
> >
> > --- In
> > Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com<Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > Sumit Loya <loya.sumit@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > If you look at the properties of the field, you will notice that EnumType
> > > field is empty but it indicates that there is some enum attached. Looks
> > like
> > > the Base Enum attached with the field has been deleted in AX 4.0.
> > >
> > > In AX 2009 the Enum Type has been changed to ABC. This code will work in
> > AX
> > > 2009.
> > >
> > > Attached are the screen shots of the two in 4.0 and 2009.
> > >
> > > Hope this resolves your query.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sumit
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:09 PM, tkbsmanian <tkbsmanian@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Today i came up with one strange thing. I executed the script given
> > below.
> > > > Please go through and let me know why its happening in such a way...
> > > >
> > > > 1. static void enumId(Args _args)
> > > > 2. {
> > > > 3. EnumId enumId;
> > > > 4. SysDictEnum sysDictEnum;
> > > > 5.
> > > > 6. SysDictTable sysDictTable;
> > > > 7. SysDictField sysDictField;
> > > > 8. ;
> > > > 9.
> > > > 10. sysDictTable = new SysDictTable(978);
> > > > 11. sysDictField = new SysDictField(sysDictTable.id(), 1);
> > > > 12.
> > > > 13. if (sysDictField.enumId())
> > > > 14. {
> > > > 15. if (sysDictField.type() == Types::Enum
> > > > 16. || sysDictField.baseType() == Types::Enum)
> > > > 17. {
> > > > 18. sysDictEnum = new SysDictEnum(sysDictField.enumId());
> > > > 19.
> > > > 20. if (sysDictEnum)
> > > > 21. {
> > > > 22. info (sysDictEnum.name());
> > > > 23. }
> > > > 24. }
> > > > 25. }
> > > > 26. }
> > > >
> > > > Note : TableName : DEL_BMBuildTable & FieldName : BuildID
> > > >
> > > > This script which ideally should print the BaseEnum name attached
> > > > to the field, is not printing the value. The reason is, though the
> > > > field is the type of Enum, no BaseEnum or EDT derived from
> > > > BaseEnum attached to that field. Upto this ok.
> > > >
> > > > Line#18 of the above script failed on initializing because of
> > > > no Enum attached to the field though it got passed at Line#13,
> > > > since it's getting the value of 65535, which is max range for
> > > > this object (type), which is actually not attached into the field.
> > > >
> > > > Now,
> > > >
> > > > 1. If i delete the enum attached to the field, which is type of Enum
> > > > from standard SYS layer object, and after saved and sync, if i
> > > > run the same script with the corresponding TableId and FieldId
> > > > changes. It's printing the name. Why? How?
> > > >
> > > > 2. I created new table and added new field type of Enum and didn't
> > > > attached any BaseEnum. Saved it. If i run the above script, with
> > > > the corresponding TableId and FieldId changes, it's printing 'ABC'
> > > > as default value. Why? How?
> > > >
> > > > Like said in the above two scenarios, why it is not happening for the
> > > > tables like 'DEL_BMBuildTable'? (also configkey enabled)
> > > >
> > > > Any info/thought would be appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks && Regards,
> > > > Balasubramanian Kumaran.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
