Hi,
sorry to disturb you again and again.
For the table DEL_BMModuleParm, for the field BuildID, EnumType propery is in
bold but no enum attached against it, means, the attached enum may be removed
at later point of time.
Now,
If the Enum removed without removing the references from the AOT, it would have
print the enum id of that removed Enum. but, it's printing only 65535.
Since The enum id value printing 65535 means balnk, how come the
EnumType property still in bold?
After making the EnumType property into normal (by pressing enter as we know)
it's printing enum id as 65535. Fine. but, how it can possible to print the
same enum id in both the cases?
Please clarify.
Thanks && Regards,
KBS
--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Sumit Loya <loya.su...@...>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The Enum has been deleted without removing the reference so the enumid is
> still there.
>
> This is what you can do. Go to the EnumType field and just press enter (The
> property should change to Normal ie not bold)
>
> This means there is no enum attached. This should solve your problem.
>
> Once you do this the EnumId value will be 65535 (meaning blank) in AX 4.0.
>
> Regards,
> Sumit
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:49 AM, tkbsmanian <tkbsman...@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Exactly. But, even if the field attached with some enum type and after
> > removed from AOT (i.e., field is empty but, property is in Bold), it's
> > printing the id value of removed/un-available enum in AOT.
> > Please check.
> >
> > Regards,
> > KBS
> > --- In
> > Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com<Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > Sumit Loya <loya.sumit@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What has happened is that the name of the Enum was changed so the
> > EnumType
> > > field is empty (But the property is in Bold) which means there is an enum
> > > attached to the field but it is not found in the AOT. So the Enum Id is
> > not
> > > empty but there is no name in the EnumType field.
> > >
> > > For your second query, when you create a new field of Enum type and do
> > not
> > > assign anything, system by default assigns ABC type enum, this is what i
> > > have noticed and that is why it is displaying an Enum name
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sumit
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:09 PM, tkbsmanian <tkbsmanian@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sumit,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your screenshots.
> > > >
> > > > But, my question is simple and straight forward (applicable for both
> > AX40 &
> > > > AX5.0; but not to AX3.0).
> > > >
> > > > 1. How can it indicates that there is some enum attached even if
> > > > EnumType field is empty (as you replied)? If it indicates so, why
> > > > it is not printing the EnumName for DEL_BMBuildTable in AX4.0?
> > > >
> > > > 2. Why it is printing the EnumName for the user created field which
> > > > doesn't have EnumType/not attached against EnumType property?
> > > > (Having same field and table properties of DEL_BMBuildTable)
> > > >
> > > > Note : There is not only 'DEL_BMBuildTable'. There are 17 in AX4.0 and
> > 13
> > > > in AX5.0 such as DEL_BMModuleParm, DEL_BMModuleTable, DEL_BMParm,
> > > > DEL_BMTableSetup etc.
> > > >
> > > > Please clarify.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks && Regards,
> > > > Balasubramanian Kuamaran.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In
> > > > Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com<Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com>,
> >
> > > > Sumit Loya <loya.sumit@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > If you look at the properties of the field, you will notice that
> > EnumType
> > > > > field is empty but it indicates that there is some enum attached.
> > Looks
> > > > like
> > > > > the Base Enum attached with the field has been deleted in AX 4.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > In AX 2009 the Enum Type has been changed to ABC. This code will work
> > in
> > > > AX
> > > > > 2009.
> > > > >
> > > > > Attached are the screen shots of the two in 4.0 and 2009.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this resolves your query.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Sumit
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:09 PM, tkbsmanian <tkbsmanian@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Today i came up with one strange thing. I executed the script given
> > > > below.
> > > > > > Please go through and let me know why its happening in such a
> > way...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. static void enumId(Args _args)
> > > > > > 2. {
> > > > > > 3. EnumId enumId;
> > > > > > 4. SysDictEnum sysDictEnum;
> > > > > > 5.
> > > > > > 6. SysDictTable sysDictTable;
> > > > > > 7. SysDictField sysDictField;
> > > > > > 8. ;
> > > > > > 9.
> > > > > > 10. sysDictTable = new SysDictTable(978);
> > > > > > 11. sysDictField = new SysDictField(sysDictTable.id(), 1);
> > > > > > 12.
> > > > > > 13. if (sysDictField.enumId())
> > > > > > 14. {
> > > > > > 15. if (sysDictField.type() == Types::Enum
> > > > > > 16. || sysDictField.baseType() == Types::Enum)
> > > > > > 17. {
> > > > > > 18. sysDictEnum = new SysDictEnum(sysDictField.enumId());
> > > > > > 19.
> > > > > > 20. if (sysDictEnum)
> > > > > > 21. {
> > > > > > 22. info (sysDictEnum.name());
> > > > > > 23. }
> > > > > > 24. }
> > > > > > 25. }
> > > > > > 26. }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note : TableName : DEL_BMBuildTable & FieldName : BuildID
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This script which ideally should print the BaseEnum name attached
> > > > > > to the field, is not printing the value. The reason is, though the
> > > > > > field is the type of Enum, no BaseEnum or EDT derived from
> > > > > > BaseEnum attached to that field. Upto this ok.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Line#18 of the above script failed on initializing because of
> > > > > > no Enum attached to the field though it got passed at Line#13,
> > > > > > since it's getting the value of 65535, which is max range for
> > > > > > this object (type), which is actually not attached into the field.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. If i delete the enum attached to the field, which is type of
> > Enum
> > > > > > from standard SYS layer object, and after saved and sync, if i
> > > > > > run the same script with the corresponding TableId and FieldId
> > > > > > changes. It's printing the name. Why? How?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. I created new table and added new field type of Enum and didn't
> > > > > > attached any BaseEnum. Saved it. If i run the above script, with
> > > > > > the corresponding TableId and FieldId changes, it's printing 'ABC'
> > > > > > as default value. Why? How?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like said in the above two scenarios, why it is not happening for
> > the
> > > > > > tables like 'DEL_BMBuildTable'? (also configkey enabled)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any info/thought would be appreciated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks && Regards,
> > > > > > Balasubramanian Kumaran.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
