Yes this is the property but I cannot remember the different values sorry so
you will have to search MSDN etc
 
Also check on the users options setup on the PreLoad whether the Markup
trans is ticked (this is per user and the same as having FullTable cache)
 
Just to check does the slow performance happen everytime or just the first
time a specific user 'loads' the MarkupTrans?
 
Also it might be that the SQL index is clustered or something (I have yet to
fully understand when a clustered index is a good or not good idea but it
seems a common advice to check on this and potentially change it - I think
there is a setting in AOT for it...)
 
Thanks
James

  _____  

From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:axapta-knowledge-vill...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of edwardjosling
Sent: 06 August 2009 22:36
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Slow performance on Misc Charges on
Purchase Orders


  

Hi James

We use Ax2009. In the table properties I see the CacheLookup value is set to
"NotInTTS". Are you refering to this value?

--- In Axapta-Knowledge- <mailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com>
vill...@yahoogroups.com, "James Flavell" <djf1...@...> wrote:
>
> Check if the table is set as Tablecache FULL (meaning all records will be
> loaded into the users session when the user first accesses the table). If
> it is change it to NONE
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> From: Axapta-Knowledge-
<mailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com> vill...@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Axapta-Knowledge-
<mailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com> vill...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of edwardjosling
> Sent: 06 August 2009 20:38
> To: Axapta-Knowledge- <mailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com>
vill...@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Slow performance on Misc Charges on
> Purchase Orders
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All
> 
> We are experiencing very slow performance (about 10minutes to load!) when
> trying to load misc charges on purchase order header. I have noticed that
> the MarkupTrans table contains some 870 000 records (this is due to auto
> misc postings on sales order lines). Will this be the cause of the slow
> performance and if so how do one go about to improve? 
> 
> Regards
> Eddie
>




Reply via email to