I agree. I'm a bit disappointed that we don't branch our
experiements/works from a single "referential" source.
I agree too.
Good.
As I explained in an earlier email, on Tuesday
I updated the 'bookvol1' and 'ComputerTutorial' pamphlets in
book--main--1 on the Axiom Wiki directly from the src/doc
directory of the Silver branch.
Super. BUT...
If I haven't read the mailing list. I wouldn't even find
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/book--main--1/FrontPage
If there is a reference to a source it MUST appear on the
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomSources page. Otherwise nobody will
find it. I even believe that it would be enough to have axiom--test--1
on the wiki. Cannot you merge your book--main--1 with axiom--test--1 and
remove the wiki--book--main--1 thing? Furthermore there should be a SVN
branch on sourceforge so that people who want to contribute to the book
could also do this via SVN. Both the SVN branch and the wiki-axiom
sources should be in sync. I guess that might be a bit hard, since svn
doen't feature star-merge.
> Then I applied the patches
supplied by Frithjof Schulze. So now these files on the wiki
are ready for online editing. Later we will merge these back
to Silver and then from Silver to gold. Isn't that how it's
supposed to work?
Right, but I would rather like to restrict the attribute "silver" to the
SVN trunk. All the other branches on sourceforge are in a testing phase
and only enter silver (=trunk) if they are at least reasonably stable.
And they can enter it only by a request of the maintainer of the testing
branch. (Which also means there should never be a branch that has no
responsible person attached.)
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer