The point is that we should *not* call the whole SourceForge SVN
repository Silver, but only the trunk. Otherwise Silver =
Sourceforge/Axiom (with now 3 or 4 (different) branches of the
axiom Sources).
Are you referring to the CVS on SourceForge (presumably identical
to the CVS on Savannah)? I thought these only had a single branch.
Who is using CVS? Cannot we just remove support for CVS? We are
needlessly investing time in keeping all the different repositories in
sync (who is actually doing it?) As far as I understand Tim releases
axiom--main--1-patch-??, calls that Gold and then transfers the code to
the two CVS repositories on Savannah and SF. So there are 3 ways to get
GOLD.
If you are talking about the arch (tla) archive on axiom-developer
then, you are right. I was just about to ask whether we should refer
to these a "Gold" or not.
No, I would only call axiom--main--1 as Gold. Click on Sources on the
frontpage. Until now nobody has complained about the page that I have
created so I think we should stick to it (until somebody is bold). ;-)
> There are actually more like 10 of these
branchs and one of them is the axiom--windows--1 branch. That is
the only branch that builds on Windows now. Do we call it Gold?
No. BTW, why cannot axiom--windows--1 be merged with axiom--main--1? Is
it so different?
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer