"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

| Actually I agree. Your original patch was not so bad - it is
| just that it did not add any explanation to the document itself.
| It improved the program but did not improve the document.

You very well capture the essence of my original remarks.

[...]

| In any case, I do very much appreciate your work on this problem
| and your willingness to contribute it to the Axiom source code
| repositories. Thank you very much! :-)

Indeed.  More Waldeks would be appreciated for Axiom.

-- Gaby


_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

Reply via email to