Le dimanche 26 novembre 2006 à 21:37 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit : > "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On November 26, 2006 2:58 PM Vanuxem Gregory wrote: > | > ... > | > > On November 26, 2006 10:06 AM Gaby asked: > | > > > > | > > > What happens if you just say: > | > > > > | > > > )lisp (boottran::boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot") > | > > > > | > > > ? > | > > > > | > > > | > > Hmmm... > | > > > | > > (1) -> )lisp (boottran::boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot") > | > > > | > > >> System error: > | > > The function BOOTTRAN::BOOT is undefined. > | > > | > I think Gaby wanted to say: > | > > | > )lisp (boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot") > | > > | > | So why not just say what it is supposed to do instead of > | making me "experiment"? <sigh> > > ??? > > I did mean boottran::boot, as I intended boot from package boottran > which is documented (src/boot/ptyout.boot) as > > -- (boot "filename") translates the file "filename.boot" to > -- the common lisp file "filename.clisp", compiles it and loads > -- the bbin/o file.
Sorry. I see now. Greg _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer