All of these remarks are stinging and pointed. So were the remarks
directed at me. Raise your eyes. Look toward cooperating by contributing
your time and energy to goals that go beyond the personal. Spend SOME of
your time on documenting/merging/testing your work. We need to start
working like SBCL, like GNU binutils, like Linux, like every other
project. There are no quick fixes. It is all hard work. We need to
change the "best-branch-wins" attitude so we can work together to
build a great system.
So we've entertained the "Sit Proposal". Now it is time to entertain
the "Daly Proposal". We don't need a web page to vote. Here's how to
submit your vote.... Figure out a needed feature (e.g. Hyperdoc fix),
make a diff-Naur changeset, document, test, and post it.
Tim, in order to help Gaby and Waldek to submit patches (which at least
Gaby said, he will do), it is very important that they know the svn
revision numbers of the changes that you took out.
*Please, post the ranges of SVN revisions* (something like
234:256,332:341, etc.) that you took from Waldek's or Gaby's branch and
post them to the list.
If that is done then we probably would not have to vote about taking
over Waldek's branch and just move it to trunk. That this will cause
problems for you is clear. But at the moment, there is no easy way to
relate the patches that you have applied to trunk to revision numbers of
Gaby's and Waldek's branch. That is one of the current problems. It is
not the unwillingness to contribute to trunk.
It is the problem that we cannot agree on *one* SCM and that the
relation between trunk and build-improvements and wh-sandbox is unclear.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
