On 8/8/07, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Bill Page wrote: > ... > | What do expect the meaning of #2 and #3 to be? > | > | As I understand Spad syntax, if I write > | > | ( #1 + #2 + #3 ) > | > | this is a shorthand for the following anonymous function > | > | (x,y,z) +-> x + y + z > | > | Is that correct? > > I think so. > > Note however, that in nested context, I believe the rules are a bit different. > That is: > > f(#1, g(#1, #2)) > > would be equivalent to > > x +-> f(x, (y, z) +-> g(y, z)) > > However, I can't find a documentation for that. >
Ahhh, I see! Excellent. Now there is documentation. :-) Thank you. Regards, Bill Page. _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
