[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > But does it really need so many sub-languages? | | Well, that's a religious question. | | Some on the wailing list feel that Meta and Boot should be recovered, | made strongly typed, and closer to the algebra language. On the plus | side it will be claimed that these are "higher level" (or could be | made into higher level since they are really just syntactic sugar). | On the minus side Meta and Boot are languages with 3 people who read | them and no-one who writes them.
That counts, obviously is inacurate; is the inaccuracy necessary to make your point? [...] | I firmly believe that the internals should be in common lisp. It | already is common lisp modulo some "syntactic sugar" (e.g. current | boot). Over the years I've been slowly removing this sugar and using | only common lisp. We just has discussions and evidence posted on the list that we are not using Common Lisp. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
