>> Third, even if the NSF funded SAGE, how would those funds benefit the >> various subprojects like Axiom? > >let me give my opinion on that specific point. As a developer of two >"subprojects" used by SAGE, I can say that the SAGE developers do a >tremendous work in porting, testing, reporting bugs and even patches >to "upstream" developers. This saves a lot of time to the subproject >developers, and helps a lot in improving the quality of those subprojects.
While I agree that participation in Sage is a good idea and a source of testing, I was asking about how the funding of Sage would benefit projects like Axiom? How might we pay a developer to expand on symbolic summation code? Tim _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
