Gaby, On 12/13/07, you wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Bill Page wrote: > > | I am not against revising the status categories so they are > | more specific and better organized but I do think it is essential > | that we treat all versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on > | the NewSynthesis Axiom Wiki. Doing things the way you > | suggest does not seem sufficiently equitable to me. > > It is normal for people to preach for the religion they like the > best.
Yes. I am glad for comments, questions or suggestions from anyone. But actual material contributions are the best of all... :-) > > Bill, it is your project; so, I'll let you decide -- I appreciate your > effort at being equitable. > The phrase "your project" might often be interpreted as a euphemism for "don't expect any help from me" ;-) especially when something is intended as a "community" effort. Anyway now that we can support OpenAxiom on the Axiom Wiki I would like to create some pages specifically to show off some of what is different about OpenAxiom compared to the others. I have a little start at that here: http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/SandBoxOpenAxiom I would like to expand this, add some useful documentation or references to documentation and then make it a full-fledged "article" page rather than just a "sandbox" page. If you or anyone in your group would like to contribute to this, it would be a great help to me. So far all that I have is what I can follow from your patches and posts to the open-axiom list. Regards, Bill Page. _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
