Bill, Gaby, > > I guess the simplest solution is to replace the "status" categories > > as follows: > > > > open ... open in all versions > > closed ... closed in all versions > > > > closed in FriCAS > > closed in OpenAxiom > > closed in Axiom > > > > open in FriCAS --- closed in Axiom and OpenAxiom > > open in OpenAxiom > > open in Axiom > > > > many of the others are not needed or could be merged: > > > > assigned, revised, postponed -> not needed > > > > pending, planned, testing -> merge with fix proposed > > > > not reproducible, need more info -> merge > > > > I think that would be much better organized. > > > > I am not against revising the status categories so they are more > specific and better organized but I do think it is essential that we > treat all versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on the > NewSynthesis Axiom Wiki. Doing things the way you suggest does not > seem sufficiently equitable to me.
Sorry, I can't see: which version of axiom would be preferred by the proposal above? Martin _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
