----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:50 PM Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit: ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
> > > > > > "sanjaya singharage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/01/2005 09:34:14: > > > For a release of course we can proivde the source for the samples > generated > > with the tool of that release. Otherwise I guess we will making new uses > > life more difficult. > > True, but they're going to need to generate the stubs for themselves at > some point. Doing this as part of the samples seems a natural part of the > education. (particularly as we'll be confident of these working first time > and everytime) > Yes I think you have a point. As you say generating code should be a "natural part". Agreed. > > sanjaya. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Adrian Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:21 PM > > Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit: > > ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My opinion is that we should also remove them from samples, certainly > in > > > CVS. Maybe we need to ensure the samples documentation has clear > > > instructions for the users on generating stubs from the WSDL. > > > > > >
