Hi Sanjaya, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi Dinesh, > > If it is a local transport I should be able to make use of it without an > http server. In the design of Axis2 the http protocol is treated as > another transport, if I am not mistaken. So having to run an http server > to make use the local transport doesn't sound right somatically. Well...I think ,I confused everyone :) , by using name Local Transport. When both server and client in same machine there is a performance improvement using Unix Domain Sockets [1]. If we are going to use Unix Domain Sockets with Axis2/C, definitely there should be a server to listen up for incoming localhost connections [2]. Therefore My suggestion was extend axis2_http_server functionality for Unix Domain Sockets with a parameter in axis2.xml. Theoretically there is a performance gain in using Unix Domain Sockets in local transport. I'm not sure whether there is a practical performance gain. thanks, Dinesh 1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/2005-February/001143.html 2. http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~beej/guide/ipc/usock.html -- Dinesh Premalal http://xydinesh.wordpress.com GPG ID : A255955C GPG Key Finger Print : C481 E5D4 C27E DC34 9257 0229 4F44 266E A255 955C --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
