Are we going to skip serializing/deserializing of OM trees in use in
this case? If so how?
Samisa...
Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi Sanjaya,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Dinesh,
If it is a local transport I should be able to make use of it without an
http server. In the design of Axis2 the http protocol is treated as
another transport, if I am not mistaken. So having to run an http server
to make use the local transport doesn't sound right somatically.
Well...I think ,I confused everyone :) , by using name Local
Transport. When both server and client in same machine there is a
performance improvement using Unix Domain Sockets [1].
If we are going to use Unix Domain Sockets with Axis2/C, definitely
there should be a server to listen up for incoming localhost
connections [2]. Therefore My suggestion was extend axis2_http_server
functionality for Unix Domain Sockets with a parameter in axis2.xml.
Theoretically there is a performance gain in using Unix Domain Sockets
in local transport. I'm not sure whether there is a practical
performance gain.
thanks,
Dinesh
1.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/2005-February/001143.html
2. http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~beej/guide/ipc/usock.html
--
Samisa Abeysinghe : http://www.wso2.org/ (WSO2 Oxygen Tank - Web Services
Developers' Portal)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
